Samuel Sanford
1643 - 1691 (48 years)-
Name Samuel Sanford Birth 30 Apr 1643 Milford, New Haven, Connecticut, British Colonial America 
Christening 30 Apr 1643 Milford, New Haven, Connecticut, British Colonial America Gender Male Death 27 Nov 1691 Milford, New Haven, Connecticut, British Colonial America Person ID I312684225077 Oswald Genealogy Last Modified 15 Jun 2025
Family Hannah Bronson, b. 1650, Farmington, Hartford, Connecticut, United States bur. 1712, Milford, New Haven, Connecticut, United States (Age ~ 62 years) Marriage 16 Apr 1674 Milford, New Haven, Connecticut, United States Family ID F1545 Group Sheet | Family Chart Last Modified 15 Jun 2025
-
Notes - !Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merge
!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merged. Possibly this was a child that died. No indication of such a situation. Ephriam, female, ID #P1C4-NW, was also merged. Needs investigating.
!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merge
!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merged. Possibly this was a child that died. No indication of such a situation. Ephriam, female, ID #P1C4-NW, was also merged. Needs investigating.!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merged. Possibly this was a child that died. No indication of such a situation. Ephriam, female, ID #P1C4-NW, was also merged. Needs investigating.
Non-standard gedcom data: 1 AFN GXXR-X
Non-standard gedcom data: 1 AFN GXXR-X9
!Savage Compendium of First Settlers of
!Savage Compendium of First Settlers of N.E.
LDS AFN: 1952-VW.
LDS AFN: 1952-VW.
1 _IFLAGS 0 AF 1952-SK Merged; Birthda
1 _IFLAGS 0 AF 1952-SK Merged; Birthdate 30 Apr 1643 replaced abt 1649; all otherinfo from AF 1952-SK AF 1952-SK Merged; Birthdate 30 Apr 1643 replaced abt 1649; all otherinfo from AF 1952-SK
1646
1646
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> 1952-SK
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> 1952-SK
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> 1952-VW
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> 1952-VW
wife chr 20Jul1646
wife chr 20Jul1646
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> GXXR-X9
Ancestral File Number:<AFN> GXXR-X9
GEDCOM line 406 not recognizable or too
GEDCOM line 406 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Samuel GEDCOM line 407 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 410 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@ GEDCOM line 406 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Samuel GEDCOM line 407 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 410 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@ GEDCOM line 349 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Samuel GEDCOM line 350 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 353 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@ GEDCOM line 349 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Samuel GEDCOM line 350 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 353 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@
Ancestral File Dec 1991 IGI
Ancestral File Dec 1991 IGI
!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merg
!Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merged. Possibly this was a child that died. No indication of such a situation. Ephriam, female, ID #P1C4-NW, was also merged. Needs investigating.
!R1168 Samuel Sanford, ID#P1C4-LK was me
!R1168 Samuel Sanford, ID#P1C4-LK was merged out, had been listed as a female. Stats were identical except for spouse(s) and sex. !Also Samuel Sanford, ID#GXXR-X9, b. abt., was merged. Were there 4 baby boys who died and had brothers named for them? Ezekiel, Samuel, Ephraim, and Thomas?!R1168 Samuel Sanford, ID#P1C4-LK was merged out, had been listed as a female. Stats were identical except for spouse(s) and sex. !Also Samuel Sanford, ID#GXXR-X9, b. abt., was merged. Were there 4 baby boys who died and had brothers named for them? Ezekiel, Samuel, Ephraim, and Thomas?
This individual has the following other
This individual has the following other parents in the Ancestral File: Thomas /SANFORD/ (AFN:1952-MP) and Dorothea /MEADOWS/ (AFN:8WJN-P5)
GEDCOM line 369 not recognizable or too
GEDCOM line 369 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Ephraim GEDCOM line 370 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 373 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@ GEDCOM line 369 not recognizable or too long: () 2 GIVN Ephraim GEDCOM line 370 not recognizable or too long: () 2 SURN SANFORD GEDCOM line 373 not recognizable or too long: () 1 SOUR @S01@
1 _UID 8C366B7E9103D611828100606E3BD45C
1 _UID 8C366B7E9103D611828100606E3BD45C62F0
!BIRTH: FATHER: Genealogical Dictionary
!BIRTH: FATHER: Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England; James Savage: 1860; Vol 4,Pg 15.
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 J
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996. From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996. From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996.
!BIRTH: FATHER: Genealogical Dictionary
!BIRTH: FATHER: Genealogical Dictionary of
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 J
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996.
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 J
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996. From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996.
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 J
From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996.From Ancestral File (TM), data as of 2 January 1996.
!Milford & New Haven Vit Recs.vol 1 pg 4
!Milford & New Haven Vit Recs.vol 1 pg 44, "New England Marriages Prior to 1700", Ancestral File.
1 _IFLAGS 0 GEDCOM FILE: 28 Aug 1991
1 _IFLAGS 0 GEDCOM FILE: 28 Aug 1991
!R1168 Samuel Sanford, ID#P1C4-LK was me
!R1168 Samuel Sanford, ID#P1C4-LK was merged out, had been listed as a female. Stats were identical except for spouse(s) and sex. !Also Samuel Sanford, ID#GXXR-X9, b. abt., was merged. Were there 4 baby boys who died and had brothers named for them? Ezekiel, Samuel, Ephraim, and Thomas?
1 _UID 8A366B7E9103D611828100606E3BD45C
1 _UID 8A366B7E9103D611828100606E3BD45C60D0
Non-standard gedcom data: 1 AFN 1952-V
Non-standard gedcom data: 1 AFN 1952-VW
- !Ephraim Sanford, ID# GXXR-VX, was merge